Supreme Court· 1/20/1969
Gardner v. California
Citations
- 393 U.S. 367
- 89 S. Ct. 580
- 21 L. Ed. 2d 601
- 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2780
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the indigent defendant had to be provided with a transcript of an eviden-tiary hearing from his original trial, so that he could file a new habeas petition
- holding that an indigent prisoner must receive ha-beas corpus proceeding transcripts under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
- holding that an indigent prisoner must receive ha-beas corpus proceeding transcripts under the Equal Protection Clause
- holding that the indigent defendant had to be provided with a transcript of an evidentiary hearing from his original trial, so that he could file a new habeas petition
- holding that the indigent defendant had to be provided with a transcript of an eviden-tiary hearing from his original trial, so that he could file a new habeas petition
- holding that the indigent defendant had to be provided with a transcript of an evidentiary hearing from his original trial, so that he could file a new habeas petition
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Douglas, Black, Hablan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
120 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court· 1996-06-24· cited 7,493×
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court· 1977-04-27· cited 4,812×
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1973-04-23· cited 3,699×
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1971-03-02· cited 3,052×
- Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court· 1972-02-23· cited 901×
- Britt v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1971-12-13· cited 727×
- United States v. MacCollomSupreme Court· 1976-06-10· cited 635×
- Kaufman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-03-24· cited 532×
- Mayer v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court· 1971-12-13· cited 487×
- Donald Harris v. Clarice StovallSixth Circuit· 2000-05-18· cited 400×
- Sanchez v. AraveIdaho Supreme Court· 1991-07-29· cited 184×
- Krause v. StateOhio Supreme Court· 1972-07-19· cited 145×
- Boyd v. NewlandNinth Circuit· 2006-10-25· cited 115×
- Eugene Mason v. State of Arizona, A. E. Gomes, Superintendent, Arizona State Prison AtflorenceNinth Circuit· 1975-02-18· cited 106×
- In Re CrowCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-04-26· cited 93×
- Wade v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1970-01-19· cited 81×
- Colonial Times, Inc., D.B.A. The Daily Rag v. Honorable Oliver Gasch, United States District JudgeD.C. Circuit· 1975-01-03· cited 80×
- Olen (Allen) Lee v. Nathan Habib, Olen Lee v. Nathan HabibD.C. Circuit· 1970-01-22· cited 78×
- Robert E. Kennedy v. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, State of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 2004-08-18· cited 76×
- Dawn Elaine Brown, by and Through Gayle (Brown) Marden, as Her Mother and Next Friend, Cross v. Dixie Herlong Chastain, CrossFifth Circuit· 1969-10-02· cited 75×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Draper v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 654×
- Smith v. BennettSupreme Court· 1961-04-17· cited 488×
- Lane v. BrownSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 460×
- Long v. District Court of Iowa, Lee Cty.Supreme Court· 1966-12-05· cited 196×
- Loustalot v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1947-11-21· cited 53×
Other cases named Gardner v. California
10 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Gardner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1962-02-26· cited 1×
- Gardner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20
- Gardner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1968-05-06
- Gardner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1968-05-20
- Gardner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1968-06-17
- Gardner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-04-28
- Gardner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-04-28
- Gardner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-05-26
- Gardner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1970-08-03
- Gardner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1996-10-07
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.