Boyd v. Newland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was error for state appellate court not to review complete voir dire transcript because without such review there could be no comparative juror analysis
• holding that it was error for state appellate court not to review complete voir dire transcript because without such review there could be no comparative juror analysis
• noting that some state courts and at least three sister circuits disagree with our nar- row interpretation of the exception in Tighe
• noting that some state courts and at least three sister circuits disagree with our nar- row interpretation of the exception in Tighe
• collecting cases that disagree with our holding in Tighe that nonjury juvenile adjudications do not fall within the prior conviction exception
• “[N]othing in the struck juror’s voir dire responses intimated a legitimate basis for removal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).