Donald Harris v. Clarice Stovall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing the Supreme Court's rejection in Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 408-13 (2000), of the \debatable among reasonable jurists\ standard
• affirming despite finding that “the district court erroneously applied the AEDPA”
• trial court’s failure to investigate extraneous influence on jury was trial error subject to harmless-error review
• variously quoting Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 120 S. Ct. 1495, 146 L. Ed. 2d 389 (2000) to explain these standards
• variously quoting Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 120 S. Ct. 1495, 146 L. Ed. 2d 398 (2000) to explain the standard
• trial court’s failure to investigate extraneous influence on jury was trial error subject to harmless-error review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).