Skip to main content
· 3/31/2006

Garcia, Guadalupe L. v. Johanns, Michael

Citations

  • 444 F.3d 625
  • 370 U.S. App. D.C. 280
  • 64 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 475
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 7892

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining under section 1292(b) to review claim “benefit[ing] from further development in the district court”
  • “Establishing commonality for a disparate treatment class is particularly difficult where, as here, multiple decisionmakers with significant local autonomy exist.”
  • assuming arguendo that disparate-impact doctrine applies under Equal Credit Opportunity Act
  • assuming arguendo that disparate-impact doctrine applies under Equal Credit Opportunity Act
  • “Failure to adequately demonstrate any of the four [23(a) factors] is fatal to class certification.”
  • “Failure to adequately demonstrate any of the four [23(a) factors] is fatal to class certification.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sentelle, Henderson, Edwards

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.