Supreme Court of South Carolina· 6/26/1989
Dunn v. Dunn
Citations
- 380 S.E.2d 836
- 298 S.C. 365
- 1989 S.C. LEXIS 136
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that although South Carolina law does not give preference to blood relatives for adoption, it is nevertheless one consideration in determining the child's best interest
- noting that the best interest of the child is the ultimate consideration
- finding section 20-7-1820, the predecessor to section 63-9-1110, did not create a preference for blood relatives in adoption proceedings because the grandparent status of the appellants was but one factor in determining the child's best interests
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chandler, Gregory, Harwell, Finney, Toal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dodge v. DodgeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-04-20· cited 30×
- S.C. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-05-09· cited 20×
- McCann v. DoeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-04-07· cited 16×
- McCutcheon v. Charleston County Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1990-08-06· cited 12×
- South Carolina Department of Social Services v. TharpSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-01-17· cited 8×
- Varn v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1993-03-22· cited 7×
- Brown v. Baby Girl HarperSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-09-29· cited 6×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Galloway v. GallowaySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1967-02-28· cited 31×
- Bevis v. BevisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1970-06-26· cited 21×
- Chandler v. MerrellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-02-02· cited 11×
- South Carolina Department of Social Services v. HyattSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-10-12· cited 7×
- Kemry v. FoxSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-06-07· cited 4×
- South Orange Trust Co. v. CONNERSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1955-10-05· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.