Gaines v. Stenseng

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing dismissal of a claim involving 75 days’ segregation where district court had failed to examine conditions of con- finement
• remanding for consideration of the particular conditions of confinement in segregation to determine whether an inmate’s 75-day placement was atypical and significant
• directing the district court on remand to determine whether the 75-day duration of plaintiff’s -5- confinement in segregation is atypical and significant
• reversing dismissal of a claim involving 75 days' segregation where district court failed to examine conditions of confinement
• finding no cognizable Section 1983 claim for “alleged violations of ... prison regulations”
• “To the extent Gaines seeks relief for alleged violations of state statutes and prison regulations, however, he has stated no cognizable claim under § 1983.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Trujillo v. Williams
  Tenth Circuit· 2006-10-17· cited 926×
• Marion v. Columbia Correctional Institution
  Seventh Circuit· 2009-03-23· cited 377×
• Gaines v. Stenseng
  Tenth Circuit· 2002-06-07· cited 101×
• Rezaq v. Nalley
  Tenth Circuit· 2012-04-20· cited 85×
• Harmon v. Cradduck
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 2012-09-18· cited 57×
• Estate of DiMarco v. Wyoming Department of Corrections, Division of Prisons
  Tenth Circuit· 2007-01-24· cited 44×
• Jordan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
  Tenth Circuit· 2006-07-25· cited 23×
• United States v. Broadway
  D. Colorado· 2008-02-25· cited 17×
• Escobar v. Reid
  D. Colorado· 2009-09-17· cited 16×
• Romero ex rel. Romero v. Board of County Commissioners
  D. New Mexico· 2016-08-15· cited 8×
• Carr v. Brill
  Tenth Circuit· 2006-07-10· cited 4×
• McDonald v. Miller
  D. Colorado· 2013-05-13· cited 3×
• Beauclair v. Graves
  Tenth Circuit· 2007-05-22· cited 2×
• Halcomb v. Ravenal
  D. South Carolina· 2018-09-30· cited 1×
• ESTATE OF
  Tenth Circuit· 2007-01-24
• Marion, War N. v. Columbia Correctiona
  Seventh Circuit· 2009-03-23
• United States v. Real Property Known as 7208 East 65th Place, Tulsa
  N.D. Oklahoma· 2016-05-05

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Graham v. Connor
  Supreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 16,485×
• Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.
  Supreme Court· 1970-06-01· cited 15,427×
• Sandin v. Conner
  Supreme Court· 1995-06-19· cited 9,097×
• Perkins v. Kansas Department of Corrections
  Tenth Circuit· 1999-01-27· cited 821×
• Curley v. Perry
  Tenth Circuit· 2001-04-18· cited 712×
• David Leon Cummings v. Edward Evans, Warden Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
  Tenth Circuit· 1998-11-12· cited 234×
• Colon v. Howard
  Second Circuit· 2000-06-09· cited 169×
• Evelyn Hill v. Irene Ibarra, in Her Official Capacity the Denver Department of Social Services Mary Krane, in Her Official Capacity
  Tenth Circuit· 1992-01-28· cited 46×
• Llahsram v. Cockrell
  Supreme Court· 2001-10-01· cited 21×

Other cases named Gaines v. Stenseng

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Gaines v. Stenseng
  Tenth Circuit· 2002-06-07· cited 101×