Skip to main content
· 8/24/2007

Gaines v. Kelly

Citations

  • 235 S.W.3d 179
  • 50 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1054
  • 2007 Tex. LEXIS 701
  • 2007 WL 2404840

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that agent had actual authority to deliver and explain loan documents but did not have actual authority to negotiate terms of the loans
  • holding that agent had actual authority to deliver and explain loan documents but did not have actual authority to negotiate terms of the loans
  • stating that when assessing existence of agent’s apparent authority, courts examine principal’s conduct and reasonableness of third party’s assumptions about authority
  • stating that agent’s authority to act depends on some communication by principal either to agent (for actual authority) or to third party (for apparent authority)
  • explaining the declarations of the alleged agent, without more, are incompetent to establish the existence or scope of the agency relationship
  • stating principal is liable for acts of another acting as its agent only when agent has actual or apparent authority to do those acts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Medina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.