Skip to main content
· 6/10/2011

Howard v. Burlington Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 347 S.W.3d 783
  • 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 4400
  • 2011 WL 2279067

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming summary judgment and concluding that a “claim for misrepresentation cannot stand when the party asserting the claim is legally charged with knowledge of the true facts”
  • “Texas law is clear that the policy’s language controls and the insured has a duty to read and be familiar with the terms of his own insurance policy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richter, Lang, Myers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.