Gaillard v. Natomas Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting no double derivative action in California because Cal. Corp.Code § 800 requires contemporaneous ownership of shares in corporation on behalf of which suit was brought
• shareholder who meets contemporaneous ownership requirement for shareholder derivative action has standing to proceed with the complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Grosset v. Wenaas
  California Supreme Court· 2008-02-14· cited 127×
• Jara v. Suprema Meats, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2004-08-30· cited 49×
• Steinberg v. Amplica, Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 1986-12-31· cited 46×
• Gaillard v. Natomas Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1989-03-23· cited 43×
• Unnamed case
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-08-19· cited 38×
• Batchelder v. Kawamoto
  Ninth Circuit· 1998-07-15· cited 36×
• In Re First Interstate Bancorp Consolidated Shareholder Litigation
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1998-10-07· cited 32×
• Shields v. Singleton
  California Court of Appeal· 1993-05-20· cited 32×
• Draper v. Paul N. Gardner Defined Plan Trust
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1993-05-28· cited 31×
• Summers v. Colette
  California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-04-15· cited 17×
• Pacific Lumber Co. v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1990-11-20· cited 13×
• In Re General Instrument Corp. Securities Litigation
  N.D. Illinois· 1998-09-22· cited 9×
• Timko v. Triarsi
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-11· cited 8×
• Kirschner Brothers Oil, Inc. v. Natomas Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1986-09-19· cited 8×
• Lewis v. Seneff
  M.D. Florida· 2009-08-19· cited 6×
• Unnamed case
  Ninth Circuit· 1998-07-15· cited 4×
• Brown v. Tenney
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-04-30· cited 3×
• Chemed Corp. v. State Board of Equalization
  California Court of Appeal· 1987-06-03· cited 2×
• J. Ball Trust v. Phx Orchard
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-10-02· cited 2×
• Federal Deposit Insurance v. Alshuler
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-08-19· cited 1×

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority
  Supreme Court· 1936-02-17· cited 3,147×
• Clean Air Constituency v. California State Air Resources Board
  California Supreme Court· 1974-06-27· cited 170×
• Lewis v. Anderson
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1984-04-18· cited 156×
• Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of El Segundo
  California Supreme Court· 1977-03-17· cited 136×
• Bokat v. Getty Oil Company
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1970-01-15· cited 106×
• Goldstein v. Groesbeck
  Second Circuit· 1944-04-07· cited 93×
• Dudley Warren Schilling, Cross v. J. A. Belcher, Sr., Cross Dudley Warren Schilling v. J. A. Belcher, Sr.
  Fifth Circuit· 1978-10-27· cited 72×
• Houge v. Ford
  California Supreme Court· 1955-06-24· cited 55×
• Henderson v. Mann Theatres Corp.
  California Court of Appeal· 1976-12-28· cited 32×
• Mueller v. MacBan
  California Court of Appeal· 1976-08-12· cited 22×
• Ensher v. Ensher, Alexander & Barsoom, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1960-12-15· cited 21×
• Steidl v. Freygang
  California Court of Appeal· 1948-12-31· cited 19×
• J. C. Peacock, Inc. v. Hasko
  California Court of Appeal· 1960-08-26· cited 18×
• Pearce v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1983-12-16· cited 17×
• Niesz v. Gorsuch
  Ninth Circuit· 1961-10-25· cited 13×
• Rosenfeld v. Zimmer
  California Court of Appeal· 1953-03-16· cited 11×
• Stockton v. Ortiz
  California Court of Appeal· 1975-04-14· cited 11×
• Lewis v. Anderson
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1982-10-08· cited 8×