Skip to main content
· 8/26/1999

In Re First Interstate Bancorp Consolidated Shareholder Litigation

Citations

  • 756 A.2d 353
  • 1999 Del. Ch. LEXIS 178
  • 1999 WL 693165

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the \corporate benefit doctrine” of fee shifting may be relied on when some non-monetary but \valuable benefit is realized by the corporate enterprise or thé stockholders as a group.”
  • granting attorney's fees where the defendants ' decision to enter into the very merger that the plaintiffs sought when they filed the litigation mooted the plaintiffs’ claims
  • considering, on a fee application, whether fees were incurred “in litigation conducted on a non-expedited schedule”
  • considering, on a fee application, whether fees were incurred “in litigation conducted on a non-expedited schedule”
  • discussing the appropriate source of fees for benefit to a stockholder class under the ―common fund‖ and ―corporate benefits‖ doctrines

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lamb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.