· 2/14/2008
Grosset v. Wenaas
Citations
- 175 P.3d 1184
- 72 Cal. Rptr. 3d 129
- 42 Cal. 4th 1100
- 2008 Cal. LEXIS 1414
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a plaintiff need not “have a personal stake in the outcome of the controversy” to bring suit
- noting that a plaintiff need not “have a personal stake in the outcome of the controversy” to bring suit
- explaining that while “Article III of the 9 federal Constitution imposes a ‘case-or-controversy limitation on federal court jurisdiction,’ . . . 10 There is no similar requirement in our state Constitution”
- collecting cases from Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Oklahoma, Louisiana, New York, Illinois, Delaware, Oregon, and Arizona
- referring to the statutory cause of action in determining whether a plaintiff has a cause of action
- referring to the statutory cause of action in determining whether a plaintiff has a cause of action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baxter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.