Skip to main content
· 2/14/2008

Grosset v. Wenaas

Citations

  • 175 P.3d 1184
  • 72 Cal. Rptr. 3d 129
  • 42 Cal. 4th 1100
  • 2008 Cal. LEXIS 1414

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a plaintiff need not “have a personal stake in the outcome of the controversy” to bring suit
  • noting that a plaintiff need not “have a personal stake in the outcome of the controversy” to bring suit
  • explaining that while “Article III of the 9 federal Constitution imposes a ‘case-or-controversy limitation on federal court jurisdiction,’ . . . 10 There is no similar requirement in our state Constitution”
  • collecting cases from Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Oklahoma, Louisiana, New York, Illinois, Delaware, Oregon, and Arizona
  • referring to the statutory cause of action in determining whether a plaintiff has a cause of action
  • referring to the statutory cause of action in determining whether a plaintiff has a cause of action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baxter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.