Nevada Supreme Court· 8/28/1997
Funches v. State
Citations
- 944 P.2d 775
- 113 Nev. 916
- 1997 Nev. LEXIS 117
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a defendant is considered unavailable to testify when invoking his Fifth Amendment right not to testify
- rejecting a strict construction of NRS 171.198’s list of conditions that create unavailability and expanding the definition to include NRS 51.055 and other general provisions of the evidence code when determining a witness’s unavailability
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rose, Shearing, Springer, Maupin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Byford v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2000-02-28· cited 246×
- Thomas v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1998-11-25· cited 53×
- Hernandez v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2008-07-31· cited 34×
- State v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.Nevada Supreme Court· 2018-03-01· cited 13×
- STATE VS. DIST. CT. (BAKER (JEFFREY))Nevada Supreme Court· 2018-03-01
- FLOWERS (NORMAN) VS. STATE C/W 55759Nevada Supreme Court· 2020-01-30
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sanborn v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1991-06-06· cited 56×
- Aesoph v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 32×
- Drummond v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1970-01-05· cited 26×
- Pacheco v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1965-12-13· cited 14×
- LaPena v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1980-01-10· cited 10×
- Anderson v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1993-12-22· cited 6×
- Lemberes v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1981-10-26· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.