Indiana Court of Appeals· 5/26/2006
Fultz v. State
Citations
- 849 N.E.2d 616
- 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 1207
- 2006 WL 1727983
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that a fact-finder may disregard self-serving testimony lacking credibility
- recognizing that a fact-finder may disregard self-serving testimony lacking credibility
- “It was entirely within the jury’s province to disregard Fultz’s self- serving testimony”
- “It was entirely within the jury’s province to disregard Fultz’s self-serving testimony”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Friedlander, Sullivan, Vaidik
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McHenry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2005-01-06· cited 491×
- Moore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-06-22· cited 118×
- Newsome v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-10-14· cited 72×
- Davenport v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-23· cited 48×
- Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-02-04· cited 24×
- Davenport v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-07-28· cited 22×
- Gornick v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-08-17· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.