Hamilton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting defendant's claim that his sentence violates Hale v. State , 630 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1993
• rejecting defendant’s claim that his sentence violates Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 1993
• “Because appellant's sentences do not, in the aggregate, exceed the maximum he could have received if all sentences subject to enhancement under the habitual felony offender statute had been enhanced (but run concurrently) . . . he is not entitled to relief”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mills v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-10-30· cited 8×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-09-18· cited 2×
• Flowers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-02-23· cited 1×
• Bryan Flowers v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-02-23
• Rodriguez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-18
• BERNARD PIERRE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-03-01

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hale v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-14· cited 430×
• State v. Hill
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-10-05· cited 18×
• Fuller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-06· cited 16×
• Kiedrowski v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-29· cited 13×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-06-10· cited 5×
• Cargle v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-11-01· cited 4×
• Ward v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-24· cited 2×