District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 10/14/2005
Frye v. United States
Citations
- 926 A.2d 1085
- 2005 D.C. App. LEXIS 532
- 2005 WL 2665432
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “To constitute an attempt, the act ‘must come dangerously close to completing the crime.’” (quoting Criminal Jury Instructions for the District of Columbia, No 4.04 (4th ed. 2002))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Farrell, Wagner, Ruiz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Curtis JenkinsD.C. Circuit· 2022-10-11· cited 46×
- Joiner-Die v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-05-25· cited 42×
- Kaliku v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-05-13· cited 41×
- Perry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-12-15· cited 40×
- Presley v. Commercial Moving & Rigging, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-07-28· cited 32×
- Hartridge v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-03-23· cited 26×
- Lee Carrell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-11-21· cited 24×
- Mitchell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-12-31· cited 19×
- Walker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-10-22· cited 17×
- Buchanan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-12-08· cited 15×
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-01-31· cited 15×
- Harrison v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-10-27· cited 13×
- Fox v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-01-27· cited 13×
- James A. Corbin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-07-23· cited 13×
- Bacchus v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-04-30· cited 11×
- JAMARR MEDLEY ANTOINE RICHARDSON and LUCIOUS MCLEOD v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-12-18· cited 10×
- Blunt v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-10-30· cited 9×
- In re D.T.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-07-30· cited 9×
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-12-22· cited 5×
- Bodrick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-02-16· cited 2×
Cites
73 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 16,571×
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 2,822×
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-04-16· cited 1,789×
- Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court· 1987-06-19· cited 1,461×
- United States v. GagnonSupreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 1,062×
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1964-02-13· cited 860×
- Irick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-10-05· cited 211×
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-10-17· cited 210×
- United States v. BehrensSupreme Court· 1963-12-09· cited 173×
- Thompson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-08-11· cited 172×
- Commonwealth v. PeasleeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1901-01-01· cited 132×
- Nixon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-04-15· cited 125×
- Derrington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-02-21· cited 104×
- Allen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-02-28· cited 99×
- Byrd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-10-15· cited 92×
- United States v. Larry William JacksonEleventh Circuit· 1991-02-19· cited 89×
- United States v. Richard PinedaFifth Circuit· 1993-04-08· cited 86×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.