District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 10/22/2009
Walker v. United States
Citations
- 982 A.2d 723
- 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 541
- 2009 WL 3377929
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing convictions of two appellants for insufficiency of the government’s evidence, even though only one of the appellants challenged his convictions on that ground
- A “defendant has no right to be present when presence would be useless, or the benefit but a shadow.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ruiz, Blackburne-Rigsby, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-11-19· cited 36×
- Emanuel Jenkins and Azariah Israel v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-12-12· cited 31×
- Tuckson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-10-03· cited 22×
- Euceda v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-05-30· cited 21×
- Omar v. Rollerson & Rolita N. Burns v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-12-17· cited 17×
- Blaize v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-06-09· cited 16×
- Brian K. Gilliam, John A. Daniels, and Ronald L. English v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-11-21· cited 11×
- JAMARR MEDLEY ANTOINE RICHARDSON and LUCIOUS MCLEOD v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-12-18· cited 10×
- Nunnally v. GrahamDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-11-21· cited 9×
- Lucas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-05-26· cited 7×
- Joseph Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-09-18· cited 3×
- James Miller v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-05-21· cited 3×
- Shane Tynique Evans & Ebony Ruffin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-06-15· cited 2×
- Robin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2025-10-16
- Wallace & Layne v. United States Published OrderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2026-02-12
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 16,571×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-06-10· cited 7,845×
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 4,179×
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 2,882×
- Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-01-25· cited 2,251×
- Miller-El v. DretkeSupreme Court· 2005-06-13· cited 1,931×
- United States v. GagnonSupreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 1,062×
- United States v. Martinez-SalazarSupreme Court· 2000-01-19· cited 746×
- Whorton v. BocktingSupreme Court· 2007-02-28· cited 725×
- Rivera v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 2009-03-31· cited 377×
- Wilson-Bey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-07-20· cited 149×
- United States v. Spotted ElkEighth Circuit· 2008-11-26· cited 129×
- Payne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-10-15· cited 76×
- McFarland v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-11-08· cited 75×
- Butler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-07-23· cited 71×
- United States v. James Kevin NelsonFourth Circuit· 1996-12-18· cited 53×
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-07-25· cited 47×
- Coleman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-05-22· cited 45×
- Clifford v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-09-30· cited 42×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.