· 7/28/2011
Presley v. Commercial Moving & Rigging, Inc.
Citations
- 25 A.3d 873
- 2011 D.C. App. LEXIS 437
- 2011 WL 3190330
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We are not persuaded that . . . CRSS should have foreseen that its obligation under the CQM contract to ‘anticipate problems’ and to ‘monitor’ safety compliance was ‘necessary for the protection’ of Presley.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ruiz, Blackburne-Rigsby, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.