Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 12/23/2013

Frommert v. Conkright

Citations

  • 738 F.3d 522
  • 57 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1337
  • 2013 WL 6726965
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 25500

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the Layaou offset is “so-named because the same offset was used in an earlier decision interpreting the Xerox Plan”
  • stating that if this Court finds no equitable remedy to be appropriate, the Court “should enforce a reasonable interpretation of the Plan, without again considering the issue of notice”
  • “Xerox could have issued an SPD [before 1998] describing the proposed offset without rendering it unreadable”
  • “No provision in the Xerox Plan defines the offset in accordance with the method the Plan Administrator advocates”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Straub, Pooler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.