Edward Tocker v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc., Also Known as Altria Group, Inc., Kraft Foods Inc., and General Foods Corp., No. 04-5904-Cv

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a motion for leave to amend a complaint may be denied when amendment would be futile.” (citing Ellis v. Chao, 336 F.3d 114, 127 (2d Cir. 2003))
• noting that “leave to amend a complaint may be denied when amendment would be futile”
• noting that “leave to amend a complaint may be denied when amendment would be futile”
• explaining that leave to amend “may be denied when amendment would be futile’
• stating that leave to amend may be denied “when amendment would be futile”
• upholding administrator’s determination that plaintiff was not a participating employee under the plan where “ample evidence” suggested that he had been terminated, though there was “also evidence that [he] was not terminated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).