Second Circuit· 7/24/2008
Frommert v. Conkright
Citations
- 535 F.3d 111
- 44 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1461
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 15585
- 2008 WL 2837783
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a party is not entitled to administrative remand where remanding would be futile
- noting that the District Court “applied [Plan] terms” in crafting its remedy
- describing the District Court’s decision as the “eraft[ing]” of a “remedy” and acknowledging that it had directed the District Court to use “equitable principles” in doing so
- reversing the district court’s finding that the ERISA release was unenforceable in part because the defendant “encouraged [the plaintiffs] to consult an attorney”
- reversing the district court’s decision not to enforce the ERISA release in part because “[s]ome Plaintiffs-Appellees even modified the terms of the release forms with which they had been presented before signing them”
- “neither the uncertainty of [plaintiffs’] benefits at the time of release nor the fact that hindsight has revealed that such benefits are now worth more than the signing Plaintiffs-Appellees likely expected at that time can render these releases unenforceable”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Straub, Raggi, Sessions
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Conkright v. FrommertSupreme Court· 2010-04-21· cited 329×
- Shelby County Health Care Corp. v. Majestic Star Casino, LLCSixth Circuit· 2009-09-22· cited 151×
- Conkright v. FrommertSupreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 22×
- Frommert v. ConkrightSecond Circuit· 2013-12-23· cited 20×
- Frommert v. ConkrightSecond Circuit· 2019-01-14· cited 17×
- Frommert v. ConkrightW.D. New York· 2009-08-05· cited 15×
- Testa v. BeckerSecond Circuit· 2018-12-12· cited 13×
- Frommert v. ConkrightW.D. New York· 2011-11-17· cited 8×
- Kunsman v. ConkrightW.D. New York· 2013-10-16· cited 5×
- Magin v. Cellco PartnershipN.D. New York· 2009-09-29· cited 3×
- Testa v. BeckerW.D. New York· 2013-10-30· cited 3×
- Katsanis v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASS'NW.D. New York· 2011-03-24· cited 2×
- Anderson v. Xerox Corp.W.D. New York· 2014-07-10· cited 2×
- Rao v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaN.D. New York· 2015-04-23· cited 2×
- Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power LaboratoryN.D. New York· 2009-05-01· cited 1×
- Shelby County Health Care Corp v. The Majestic Star Casino, LLCSixth Circuit· 2009-09-22
- Schuyler v. Sun Life Assurance Company of CanadaSecond Circuit· 2025-08-14
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court· 1989-02-21· cited 6,595×
- Goldie Miller, as of the Estate of Sarah M. Potok v. United Welfare FundSecond Circuit· 1995-12-19· cited 332×
- Allianz Insurance Company v. Regina LernerSecond Circuit· 2005-08-02· cited 322×
- Chaplin v. NationsCredit Corp.Fifth Circuit· 2002-10-08· cited 198×
- Frommert v. ConkrightSecond Circuit· 2006-01-06· cited 131×
- Krauss v. Oxford Health Plans, Inc.Second Circuit· 2008-03-26· cited 128×
- Cecilia Nichols v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Docket No. 04-1445-CvSecond Circuit· 2005-04-21· cited 125×
- Peter J. Laniok v. Advisory Committee of the Brainerd Manufacturing Company Pension PlanSecond Circuit· 1991-06-18· cited 60×
- Kinek v. Paramount Communications, Inc.Second Circuit· 1994-04-28· cited 50×
- Theodore Carlton Richardson v. Yvonne EdwardsD.C. Circuit· 1997-12-03· cited 32×
- Alexander Lifson v. Ina Life Insurance Company of New York, Cigna Life of New York, and the Mony Life Insurance CompanySecond Circuit· 2003-06-25· cited 31×
- Rogers v. Samedan Oil Corp.Fifth Circuit· 2002-10-14· cited 30×
- Francis H. TUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TEXACO INCORPORATED, Defendant-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1998-07-22· cited 27×
- Finz v. SchlesingerSecond Circuit· 1992-02-25· cited 23×
- Chao v. MerinoSecond Circuit· 2006-06-21· cited 22×
- Frommert v. ConkrightW.D. New York· 2007-03-06· cited 17×
- Miller v. Xerox Corp. Retirement Income Guarantee PlanNinth Circuit· 2006-09-12· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.