Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 7/24/2008

Frommert v. Conkright

Citations

  • 535 F.3d 111
  • 44 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1461
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 15585
  • 2008 WL 2837783

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a party is not entitled to administrative remand where remanding would be futile
  • noting that the District Court “applied [Plan] terms” in crafting its remedy
  • describing the District Court’s decision as the “eraft[ing]” of a “remedy” and acknowledging that it had directed the District Court to use “equitable principles” in doing so
  • reversing the district court’s finding that the ERISA release was unenforceable in part because the defendant “encouraged [the plaintiffs] to consult an attorney”
  • reversing the district court’s decision not to enforce the ERISA release in part because “[s]ome Plaintiffs-Appellees even modified the terms of the release forms with which they had been presented before signing them”
  • “neither the uncertainty of [plaintiffs’] benefits at the time of release nor the fact that hindsight has revealed that such benefits are now worth more than the signing Plaintiffs-Appellees likely expected at that time can render these releases unenforceable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Straub, Raggi, Sessions

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.