Kunsman v. Conkright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the heightened Rule 9(b) requirements do not apply to a constructive fraud claim under Ohio Revised Code Section 1336.04(A)(2
• holding that fraudulent transfer claims under Section 1336.04(A)(1) are subject to Rule 9(b)
• noting the Supreme Court of Ohio’s decision in Wagner “is entitled to great deference” and holding Federal Civil Rule 9(b) does not apply to § 1336.04 claims
• applying substantive law of the state in a diversity action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).