Skip to main content
· 4/2/1979

FAY, SPOFFORD & THORNDIKE v. Mass. Port Auth.

Citations

  • 387 N.E.2d 206
  • 7 Mass. App. Ct. 336

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]hen an essential term of a contract is missing, that contract is ambiguous and it falls to us to interpret the contract sensibly in the light of the terms of the document taken as a whole....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kass

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.