Freund v. Cellofilm Properties, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• warning to be sufficient must communicate information essential to make the use of a product safe
• warning to be sufficient must communicate information essential to make the use of a product safe
• “adequate warning is one that includes the directions, communications, and information essential to make the use of a product safe.”
• where charge was not clearly applicable and may have affected jury's view of nature and extent of burden of proof shouldered by plaintiffs, use of such charge was not harmless error
• where charge was not clearly applicable and may have affected jury’s view of nature and extent of burden of proof shouldered by plaintiffs, use of such charge was not harmless error
• “[A]n adequate warning is one that includes the directions, communications, and information essential to make the use of a product safe.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

87 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• In the Matter of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Incorporated
  Seventh Circuit· 1995-04-27· cited 358×
• Feldman v. Lederle Laboratories
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-07-30· cited 248×
• H. Rosenblum, Inc. v. Adler
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-06-09· cited 234×
• Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2010-12-10· cited 227×
• Dambacher by Dambacher v. Mallis
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-07-16· cited 190×
• Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1990-07-26· cited 154×
• O'BRIEN v. Muskin Corp.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-08-02· cited 141×
• Beshada v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1982-07-07· cited 139×
• Michalko v. Cooke Color & Chemical Corp.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1982-08-16· cited 133×
• Brown v. United States Stove Co.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-12-21· cited 125×
• Strachan v. John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1988-03-16· cited 124×
• Coffman v. Keene Corp.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1993-07-26· cited 120×
• Perez v. Wyeth Laboratories Inc.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-08-09· cited 118×
• Myrlak v. Port Auth. of NY and NJ
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-02-08· cited 115×
• Fischer v. Johns-Manville Corp.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1986-07-31· cited 102×
• Lewis v. American Cyanamid Co.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1998-07-20· cited 98×
• Johnson v. Salem Corp.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-07-18· cited 94×
• Zaza v. Marquess and Nell, Inc.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1996-05-09· cited 90×
• Campos v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-12-21· cited 89×
• Payne v. Soft Sheen Products, Inc.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-01-16· cited 86×

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-05-19· cited 412×
• Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine Company
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1979-07-31· cited 358×
• Woodill v. Parke Davis & Co.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1980-02-22· cited 191×
• Phillips v. Kimwood MacHine Company
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1974-09-06· cited 154×
• Cepeda v. Cumberland Engineering Company, Inc.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1978-04-26· cited 139×
• Hamilton v. Hardy
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1976-03-18· cited 103×
• Palmer v. Avco Distributing Corp.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1980-10-17· cited 103×
• Menth v. Breeze Corporation, Inc.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1950-04-24· cited 100×
• Sterling Drug, Inc., a Corporation v. Irene M. Yarrow
  Eighth Circuit· 1969-03-12· cited 96×
• Smith v. United States Gypsum Co.
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1980-02-26· cited 80×
• Anne Needham v. White Laboratories, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 1981-01-27· cited 78×
• Sterling Jackson v. Coast Paint and Lacquer Company, a Corporation, and Reliance Universal Incorporated, a Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1974-07-01· cited 76×
• Hancock v. Paccar, Inc.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1979-09-04· cited 76×
• Aller v. Rodgers MacHinery Mfg. Co., Inc.
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1978-07-26· cited 63×
• Ernest W. Hahn, Inc. v. Armco Steel Co.
  Utah Supreme Court· 1979-09-25· cited 62×
• Smith v. Smith
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1979-04-12· cited 62×
• Shawver v. Roberts Corp.
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1979-06-29· cited 56×
• Ulrich v. Kasco Abrasives Co.
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1976-01-23· cited 54×
• Torsiello v. Whitehall Laboratories
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1979-01-23· cited 49×
• Lillie Mae Lebouef v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Travelers Insurance Company v. Ford Motor Company
  Fifth Circuit· 1980-08-11· cited 44×

Other cases named Freund v. Cellofilm Properties, Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Freund v. Cellofilm Properties, Inc.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-12-21· cited 1×
• Freund v. Cellofilm Properties, Inc.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1980-09-30