Phillips v. Kimwood MacHine Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• product is dangerously defective if reasonable manufacturer, considering all the facts and circumstances, would not put it onto the market if he had knowledge of its harmful character
• product is dangerously defective if reasonable manufacturer, considering all the facts and circumstances, would not put it onto the mar ket if he had knowledge of its harmful character
• “This court and other courts continue to flounder while attempting to determine how one decides whether a product is in a defective condition....”, especially in failure to warn and design defect situations
• \This court and other courts continue to flounder while attempting to determine how one decides whether a product is in a defective condition. . . .\, especially in failure to warn and design defect situations
• question of liability depended upon whether manufacturer warned employer, not employee
• see also Or. Rev. Stat. § 30.900 (1991)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).