Johnson v. Salem Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “ ‘[t]he weight to which an expert opinion is entitled can rise no higher than the facts and reasoning upon which that opinion is predicated’ ”
• concluding, in. a design defect case, that “the absence of a guard” constituted “at the very least a contributing casual factor in the happening of the accident”
• stating that \juries frequently are instructed to disregard certain evidence they have heard\
• discussing the testimony of the plaintiff's expert with regard to \the dangerous nip point\
• discussing the testimony of the plaintiffs expert with regard to “the dangerous nip point”
• “[s]tate-of-the-art is a relevant factor in considering the adequacy of the design of the product under the risk-utility analysis, including particularly design features relating to safety”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).