Sita v. Danek Medical, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a private cause of action exists for negligence per se upon a violation of the FDCA
• granting summary judgment against plaintiff on his design-defect claim due to his failure to adduce evidence that spinal system, of which screw was component, feasibly could have been designed more safely
• “[D]espite plaintiffs claims to the contrary, there can be no dispute that the package insert contained language that adequately warned against the precise usage and injuries in question.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).