Fredman v. Fredman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• instructing that where court approval was required “the trial court must consider the factors outlined in section 61.13(2)(d)”
• instructing that where court approval was required \the trial court must consider the factors outlined in section 61.13(2)(d)\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Fredman v. Fredman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-20· cited 15×
• Cecemski v. Cecemski
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-04-20· cited 12×
• Thyrre v. Thyrre
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-10· cited 10×
• Ted K. Brown, former husband v. Valerie Hays Brown, Former Wife
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-11-22· cited 5×
• Bates v. Bates
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2012-08-31· cited 3×
• A.V. v. M.G.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-31· cited 3×
• Crombie v. Williams
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-22· cited 2×
• In Re BTG
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-31
• Echezarreta v. Echezarreta
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-13

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hill v. Hill
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-08-01· cited 40×
• Wilson v. Wilson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-11· cited 13×
• Hayes v. Hayes
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-04-19· cited 12×
• Shafer v. Shafer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-16· cited 8×
• Bartolotta v. Bartolotta
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-01-07· cited 7×
• Buonavolonta v. Buonavolonta
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-30· cited 6×
• Seward v. Florida Department of Revenue
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-21· cited 6×