Cecemski v. Cecemski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was no substantial competent evidence to support the trial court's finding that the quality of life for the mother and child would improve when the mother testified that she had no jobs lined up or even applied for any jobs in Louisiana
• reversing an order granting relocation because the trial court's findings were not supported by substantial competent evidence
• reversing an order granting relocation because the trial court's findings were not supported by substantial competent evidence
• \[W]e find that the facts in virtually every pertinent matter of consequence do not provide substantial competent evidence to support the trial court's findings . . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).