Freddy Burton v. Infinity Capital Management

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a party that 9 fails to at least alert the court of potential conflicts between an order and the automatic stay 10 11 does not satisfy a non-debtor’s affirmative duty of compliance
• “Absolute immunity is not reserved solely for judges, but extends to nonjudicial officers for all claims relating to the exercise of judicial functions.”
• similarly recognizing that “the automatic stay imposes on non-debtor parties an affirmative duty of compliance, which includes alerting the court of potential conflicts between an order and the automatic stay”
• first quoting Hillis Motors, Inc. v. Haw. 19 Auto. Dealers’ Ass’n, 997 F.2d 581, 585 (9th Cir. 1993), then quoting Stringer v. Huet (In re 20 Stringer), 847 F.2d 549, 552 n.4 (9th Cir. 1988)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).