Eskanos & Adler, P.C. v. Somkiat G. Leetien

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a § 362(a) violation is “willful” when the creditor knows of the stay and intentionally performs the act that violates it
• reject-ing the law firm’s assertion that something more than maintaining an active collection action was needed to violate the stay
• noting that we review a bankruptcy court’s factual findings for clear error
• rejecting the law firm’s assertion that something more than maintaining an active col- lection action was needed to violate the stay
• rejecting the law firm’s assertion that something more than maintaining an active collection action was needed to violate the stay
• rejecting the law firm’s assertion that something more than maintaining an active col- lection action was needed to violate the stay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).