Skip to main content

Frazier v. State

Citations

  • 668 S.E.2d 646
  • 284 Ga. 638
  • 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 3180
  • 2008 Ga. LEXIS 801

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that sexual offender registration requirement in conjunction with criminal penalty provision enacted after appellant’s underlying conviction violates state and federal prohibitions of ex post facto laws
  • “The fact that [a defendant’s] prior conviction subjects him to possible [future] punishment [for failing to register] under OCGA § 42-1-[12] does not somehow convert the statute into an unconstitutional ex post facto law as applied to [him].”
  • \The fact that [a defendant's] prior conviction subjects him to possible [future] punishment [for failing to register] under OCGA § 42-1-[12] does not somehow convert the statute into an unconstitutional ex post facto law as applied to [him].\
  • statute criminalizing failure to register as sex offender did not violate prohibition against ex post facto laws as failure to register was felony entirely distinct from prior conviction for qualifying sex offense and did not increase punishment for the original offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.