Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 10/10/2007

Francis v. Mineta

Citations

  • 505 F.3d 266
  • 49 V.I. 1147
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 23740
  • 90 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,972
  • 101 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1217
  • 2007 WL 2938696

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Nothing in pre-Smith case law permitted an employee alleging employment discrimination based on religion to bypass Title VII’s exclusive and comprehensive scheme.”
  • statute extends Title VII’s protection to federal employees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKee, Barry, Stapleton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Francis v. Mineta

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.