Franceschina v. Hope

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• citing, with approval, the following statement from Edmund M. Morgan, Basic Problems of Evidence 218 (1962
• on questions of law, judge must instruct jury and jury must draw conclusion; legal conclusion or legal standard is not proper subject of expert testimony
• “Shivers [v. Carnaggio, 223 Md. 585 (1960)] should not be interpreted to mean that an expert witness may in his opinion on the facts include an opinion on a matter of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).