McCoy v. Hatmaker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “materials protected by [the Maryland medical peer review statute] are confidential and not discoverable, and, even when they end up in the hands of the other party to litigation, as they did here, they are inadmissible in court”
• upholding summary judgment in favor of defendant when equivocal testimony of experts failed to establish that the defendant’s conduct was grossly negligent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).