Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2/22/2012

Jones v. State

Citations

425 Md. 1
38 A.3d 333
2012 Md. LEXIS 77

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that expert testimony was unnecessary for a negligent training claim against police officers because the jury need only “common knowledge or experience” to recognize Fourth Amendment violations
stating that “[w]e have recognized the policy undergirding the public duty doctrine and applied the doctrine in a number of cases” and discussing several of them
explaining that a plaintiff can establish causation by showing that negligent training was both a “substantial factor” in an injury and that injury was a “foreseeable result”
reasoning that adequately pleaded negligence claim also satisfied fiduciary duty claim
when hiring an employee that is expected to come into contact with the public, the employer must make reasonable inquiry into the employee’s fitness
when hiring an employee that is expected to come into contact with the public, the employer must make reasonable inquiry into the employee’s fitness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barbera

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.