Skip to main content
· 12/2/1999

Fraley v. Williams Ford Tractor & Equipment Co.

Citations

  • 5 S.W.3d 423
  • 339 Ark. 322
  • 1999 Ark. LEXIS 619

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a class definition was defective where it required a determination of the merits before the court could ascertain the existence of a class
  • holding that the circuit court could not examine the affirmative defenses of release and consent in deciding whether the class should be certified
  • holding that a class definition was defective where it required a determination of the merits before the court could ascertain-the existence of a class
  • holding that the circuit court could not examine the affirmative defenses of release and consent in deciding whether to grant certification
  • holding that a class definition was defective where it required a determination of the merits before the court could ascertain the existence of a class
  • holding that we do not delve into the merits of affirmative defenses in determining whether the numerosity requirement of Rule 23 are met

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Annabelle Clinton Imber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.