· 12/2/1999
Fraley v. Williams Ford Tractor & Equipment Co.
Citations
- 5 S.W.3d 423
- 339 Ark. 322
- 1999 Ark. LEXIS 619
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a class definition was defective where it required a determination of the merits before the court could ascertain the existence of a class
- holding that the circuit court could not examine the affirmative defenses of release and consent in deciding whether the class should be certified
- holding that a class definition was defective where it required a determination of the merits before the court could ascertain-the existence of a class
- holding that the circuit court could not examine the affirmative defenses of release and consent in deciding whether to grant certification
- holding that a class definition was defective where it required a determination of the merits before the court could ascertain the existence of a class
- holding that we do not delve into the merits of affirmative defenses in determining whether the numerosity requirement of Rule 23 are met
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Annabelle Clinton Imber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.