Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. v. Palasack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• class of vehicle purchasers challenging a documentary fee charged by car dealerships, alleging in part a violation of the ADTPA
• another state's decision is not binding authority on this court
• “It is axiomatic that in order for a class action to be certified, a class must exist.... Concurrently, the class representative must be members of that class.” (quoting Van Buren Sch. Dist. v. Jones, 365 Ark. 610, 614, 232 S.W.3d 444, 448, (2006))
• “It is axiomatic that in order for a class action to be certified, a class must exist. . . . Concurrently, the class representative must be members of that class.” (quoting Van Buren Sch. Dist. v. Jones, 365 Ark. 610, 614, 232 S.W.3d 444, 448, (2006))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).