Thomas A. EVANS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. PIPE & FOUNDRY COMPANY, Etc., Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the class representative is not required to establish the exact number in the proposed class
• explaining that the class representative is not required to establish the exact number in the proposed class
• explaining that the class representative is not required to establish the exact number in the proposed class
• explaining that the class representative is not required to establish the exact number in the proposed class
• explaining that the class representative is not required to establish the exact number in the proposed class
• “starting point for determining the permissible scope of the judicial complaint is the EEOC charge and investigation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).