E.D. Texas· 6/28/2012
Fractus, S.A. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
Citations
- 876 F. Supp. 2d 802
- 2012 WL 2505741
- 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90284
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the defendant waived its indefiniteness argument by failing to present testimony or other evidence in support of the defense at trial
- finding that the defendant waived its indefiniteness argument by failing to present testimony or other evidence in support of the defense at trial
- finding waiver where the defendant did not move for JMOL regarding indefiniteness at the close of its case-in-chief or at the close of the evidence and therefore deprived the plaintiff of the opportunity to substantively respond with its own testimony or evidence
- defendant waived affirmative defense'in post-trial motion by not explicitly presenting that defense at trial, “de-priv[ing] [plaintiff] of any opportunity to substantively respond with its own testimony or evidence”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- SAS Institute, Inc. v. World Programming Ltd.Fourth Circuit· 2017-10-24· cited 132×
- Erfindergemeinschaft UroPep GbR v. LillyE.D. Texas· 2017-08-25· cited 21×
- VirnetX Inc. v. Apple Inc.E.D. Texas· 2013-02-26· cited 11×
- In re Biogen 755 Patent Litig.D. New Jersey· 2018-09-07· cited 9×
- Geoffrion v. Nationstar Mortgage LLCE.D. Texas· 2016-04-21· cited 8×
- WesternGeco L.L.C. v. Ion Geophysical Corp.S.D. Texas· 2013-06-19· cited 6×
- ASETEK Danmark A/S v. CMI USA, Inc.N.D. California· 2015-04-21· cited 5×
- Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation v. Apple, Inc.W.D. Wisconsin· 2015-09-29· cited 3×
- Fujifilm Corp. v. Motorola Mobility LLCN.D. California· 2016-04-25· cited 3×
- SimpleAir, Inc. v. Google Inc.E.D. Texas· 2014-09-30· cited 1×
- Feld Motor Sports, Inc. v. Traxxas, LPE.D. Texas· 2016-04-14
Cites
80 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-06-12· cited 12,455×
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court· 1966-02-21· cited 3,371×
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1995-04-05· cited 2,940×
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court· 1950-10-09· cited 1,620×
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossFederal Circuit· 1998-03-25· cited 1,536×
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court· 2007-04-30· cited 1,310×
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court· 2011-06-09· cited 825×
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.S.D. New York· 1970-05-28· cited 503×
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court· 1983-05-24· cited 494×
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2009-09-11· cited 489×
- The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionFederal Circuit· 1992-09-23· cited 453×
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Federal Circuit· 1995-06-15· cited 449×
- Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co.Federal Circuit· 2010-03-22· cited 436×
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1988-07-29· cited 421×
- I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.Federal Circuit· 2010-03-10· cited 374×
- Vas-Cath Incorporated and Gambro, Inc. v. Sakharam D. Mahurkar, and Quinton Instruments CompanyFederal Circuit· 1991-07-29· cited 365×
- Carroll Touch, Inc. v. Electro Mechanical Systems, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantFederal Circuit· 1993-08-24· cited 304×
- Metabolite Laboratories, Inc. And Competitive Technologies, Inc. v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (Doing Business as Labcorp)Federal Circuit· 2004-06-08· cited 291×
- Atlas Powder Company v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company and Alamo Explosives Company, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1984-12-27· cited 264×
- The Regents of the University of California v. Eli Lilly and CompanyFederal Circuit· 1997-10-24· cited 260×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.