Carroll Touch, Inc. v. Electro Mechanical Systems, Inc., Defendant/cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that express findings not necessary if record provides sufficient basis for reviewing trial court's exercise of discretion
• finding that“[a]s the party moving for attorney fees, the burden was on [the prevailing party] to prove the exceptional nature of the case by clear and convincing evidence”
• applying standards for summary judgment of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals to the antitrust counterclaim in a patent case
• “First, the claim must be properly construed to determine its scope and meaning.”
• assignor estopped from contesting patent validity where his company is alleged infringer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).