Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 9/8/1999

Foster v. Hill

Citations

  • 188 F.3d 1259
  • 1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 5429
  • 16 Colo. Bankr. Ct. Rep. 274
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 21490
  • 1999 WL 699801

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trustee forfeited argument by failing to raise it on appeal to the district court
  • holding that an appeal point was forfeited because the litigant failed to make the same argument when appealing from the bankruptcy court to the district court
  • holding that a party had “forfeited the issue in [that] appeal” by not raising it on appeal to the “district court as an alternative basis to affirm”
  • indicating that the work-product doctrine is affected when a disclosure is to an adversary
  • stating that individual debtor’s concern about incrimination “does not entitle an attorney to withhold from a client’s trustee in bankruptcy work-product prepared for the client’s pre-petition lawsuits, so long as the trustee and the client are not adverse in those suits”
  • deeming an appeal point forfeited in part because the litigant failed to make the same argument when appealing from the bankruptcy court to the district court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baldock, Kelly, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.