Skip to main content
· 8/24/1998

Federal Deposit Insurance v. United Pacific Insurance

Citations

  • 152 F.3d 1266
  • 41 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1135
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 20744

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • collecting cases from federal appellate courts applying Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and explaining that “a double recovery constitutes extraordinary circumstances which justify relief from judgment”
  • “The party seeking to invoke the attorney-client privilege has the burden of establishing its applicability.”
  • “In determining whether the relevant ... records contain privileged communications, the district court may adopt procedures, such as in camera review of allegedly privileged documents, to protect against disclosure of privileged communications.”
  • “In determining whether the relevant ... records contain privileged communications, the district court may adopt procedures, such as in camera review of allegedly privileged documents, to protect against disclosure of privileged communications.”
  • “[Rule 60(b) may not be used to] reargue an issue previously addressed by the court when the reargument merely advances new arguments or supporting facts which were available for presentation at the time of the original argument.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baldock, Holloway, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.