Skip to main content
· 8/13/2007

Foster v. Hill

Citations

  • 497 F.3d 695
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 19131
  • 2007 WL 2296523

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating a prior panel’s decision affirming a final order of removal by the Board of Immigration Appeals
  • “It is the responsibility of a court to make an independent evaluation of whether subject matter jurisdiction exists in every case.”
  • “It is the responsibility of a court to make an independent evaluation of whether subject matter jurisdiction exists in every case.”
  • “it is the responsibility of a court to make an independent evaluation of whether subject matter jurisdiction exists in every case”
  • “It is the responsibility of a court to make an independent evaluation of whether subject matter jurisdiction exists in every case.”
  • “It is the responsibility of a court to make an independent evaluation of whether subject matter jurisdiction exists in every case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kanne, Rovner, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.