Foreman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that inherent prejudice comes from the risk that the jury will convict based on the evidence of a defendant’s propensity rather than relying on proof of the crime charged
• stating that inherent prejudice comes from the risk that the jury will convict based on the evidence of a defendant's propensity rather than relying on proof of the crime charged
• further discussing these two statutory requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kane v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-19· cited 4×
• Corson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-05-27· cited 3×
• Burnett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-16· cited 2×
• Leland v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-03
• Cass v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-03-11

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. DiGuilio
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1959-03-25· cited 1,148×
• McLean v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-07-06· cited 125×
• Fitzsimmons v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-11· cited 14×
• Denmark v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-17· cited 11×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-22· cited 5×
• Coverdale v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-27· cited 4×