Skip to main content

Ford v. State

Citations

  • 334 S.W.3d 230
  • 2011 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 157
  • 2011 WL 309668

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that while the punishment level may have been increased, the “level of offense” was not increased
  • holding that while the punishment level may have been increased, the “level of offense” was not increased
  • holding that the habitual offender statute Tex. Penal Code §12.42 increases the range of 6 Specifically, the judgment contains the following erroneous notation, “Degree of Offense: State Jail Felony Enhanced to 2nd Degree Felony.” (CR 35
  • providing that, if definition of offense does not prescribe culpable mental state and one is required, “intent, knowledge, or recklessness suffices to establish criminal responsibility”
  • observing that our statement in Young v. State, 14 S.W.3d 748, 751-52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000
  • holding “[t]he court of appeals erred to rely on dicta in …” when reversing a Waco court opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keasler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.