Flynn v. Veazey Construction Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that forcing ERISA plaintiffs to litigate claims in employers’ resident forums would “undermine the financial integrity of the funds, defeating the goal of efficient administration of ERISA plans”
• acknowledging the case’s minimal connection to Washington, D.C., but nonetheless giving ERISA plaintiff's choice of forum special weight. The court also cites seven slip opinions from this jurisdiction doing the same
• noting “Congress’s intent to protect the financial integrity of such funds”
• noting “Congress’s intent to protect the financial integrity of such funds”
• all finding venue to be most appropriate in the district where the pension plan is administered in the service of uniform interpretation and efficient administration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).