Flynn v. Szwed

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• not continuous where a year-long course of treatment was followed by a 15-month gap, then two weeks of treatment, and another year-long gap
• it was conceivable that the defendant was prejudiced by an amendment that changed the dates of the defendant’s malpractice because the defendant may not have preserved the records relating to the plaintiff’s treatment at another time

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).