· 12/30/1983
Doyle v. Shlensky
Citations
- 458 N.E.2d 1120
- 120 Ill. App. 3d 807
- 76 Ill. Dec. 466
- 1983 Ill. App. LEXIS 2665
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[t]he attorney-client relationship is one of agent-principal[,] *** and the general rule is that ‘the client is bound by the acts and omissions of his lawyer-agent in the prosecution of a remedy’ ”
- “[t]he attorney-client relationship is one of agent-principal[,] *** and the general rule is that ‘the client is bound by the acts and omissions of his lawyer-agent in the prosecution of a remedy’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mejda
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.