Skip to main content
· 2/20/2001

Marek v. O.B. Gyne Specialists II, S.C.

Citations

  • 746 N.E.2d 1
  • 319 Ill. App. 3d 690
  • 253 Ill. Dec. 759

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing de novo whether the trial court properly dismissed the amended complaint as time-barred for failing to relate back to the original complaint
  • reviewing de novo whether the trial court properly dismissed the amended complaint as time-barred for failing to relate back to the original complaint
  • reviewing de novo whether the trial court properly dismissed the amended complaint as time-barred for failing to relate back to the original complaint
  • claim related back because party could not claim surprise or prejudice where amended pleading contained allegations identical to those made against party’s agent, employee and shareholder in original complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McBRIDE

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.