Skip to main content

Floyd v. State

Citations

  • 18 So. 3d 432
  • 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 359
  • 2009 Fla. LEXIS 860
  • 2009 WL 1544273

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding trial counsel was not deficient for strategically limiting unnecessary objections to avoid irritating the jury
  • “Floyd did not raise an Ake claim in his direct appeal and, therefore, this claim is procedurally barred.”
  • “Trial counsel’s investigation into mental health mitigation is not rendered incompetent merely because the defendant has now secured the testimony of a more favorable mental health expert.”
  • “There is no Brady violation where the information is equally accessible to the defense and the prosecution, or where the defense either had the information or could have obtained it through the exercise of reasonable diligence.”
  • “This Court has held that ‘[i]f a legal issue “would in all probability have been found to be without merit” had counsel raised the issue on direct appeal, the - 24 - failure of appellate counsel to raise the meritless issue will not render appellate counsel’s performance ineffective.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quince, Pariente, Lewis, Canady, Polston, Labarga, Perry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.